The study also noted that advertising mail accounts for 31% of USPS revenues – about $20 billion last year. Temple showed a mix of 40 e-mail ads and postcards to study subjects using three monitoring methods to gauge the effects the ads had on them. Eye tracking measured visual attention; fingertip sensors monitored heart rate, respiration and sweating to reveal emotional engagement; and MRIs performed scans to uncover deep brain activity. The results? Postcards were judged superior to email ads in four of nine ad attributes measured – engagement time, emotional reaction, recall, and building subconscious desire for a product or service. Email ads led in just one attribute – focusing a customer’s attention. The two methods were virtually tied in three other categories.
- Test the piece for maximum reaction. Take neuromarketing a step further by doing your own studies to determine how specific elements of a direct mail piece – whether colour, shape or use of white space – elicits the best reaction from consumers.
- Explore sequencing options. Neuroscience could also be used to determine the most effective sequence of media elements in a campaign. Does email followed by direct mail work best, or vice versa? Should other media such as TV be included?
- Consider digital print technology. Test whether using augmented reality or QR codes in mail pieces ramps up conversion rates in multi-channel campaigns.